Skip to content

When does displacement end?

How are decisions currently made and with what consequences? As we work to develop greater clarity on the criteria used to determine the end of displacement, what is the role of the IDP research community? There is now a keen…

Read more

Who does what?

Internally displaced people are particularly vulnerable. Compared with refugees, not only do they have less legal protection but also, historically, the international community has paid relatively little attention to their plight. It has been suggested that there should be a…

Read more

New approach needed to internal displacement

Recent examples abound of the chronic difficulties of the Collaborative Response: Darfur: The UN’s failure to cobble together an effective response to the massive internal displacement crisis led to unclear arrangements for camp management and allowed the Government of Sudan…

Read more

Getting non-state actors to protect IDPs

Non-state actors (NSAs) are defined by Geneva Call[1] as “any armed actor operating outside state control that uses force to achieve its political/quasi-political objective. Such actors include armed groups, rebel groups, liberation movements and de facto governments.” NSAs under consideration…

Read more

UNHCR: expanding its role with IDPs

The Emergency Relief Coordinator, the heads of the major relief and development organisations, NGO umbrella groups and the Red Cross/Red Crescent movement – which together comprise the UN’s Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC)[1] – on 12 September assigned the major responsibility…

Read more

Addressing IDP protection in Africa

Since the 1990s African conflicts have witnessed massive brutality against the civilian population. Armed combatants in Somalia, Liberia, Sierra Leone, Northern Uganda, Darfur and Eastern DRC – to mention just some – have violated the Geneva Conventions’ protocol on civilian…

Read more
DONATESUBSCRIBE