Civil society response to human trafficking in South Asia

In South Asia civil society organisations have led the way in encouraging governments to address the problem of human trafficking. A coordinated regional response by both governments and civil society organisations is urgently required.

Trafficking in South Asia is complex and multifaceted, both a development and a criminal justice problem. The main destination of people from South Asia is the Middle East but many stay within India and Pakistan. There is extensive trafficking of women and girls from Bangladesh to India, Pakistan, Bahrain, Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates. UNICEF estimates that up to half a million Bangladeshis have been trafficked in recent years and that up to 200,000 Nepali women and girls are working in India’s sex industry.[1] A small number of women and girls are trafficked through Bangladesh from Burma to India. Young boys from South Asia are trafficked to the UAE, Oman and Qatar and forced to work as camel jockeys.

South Asian governments have been slow to acknowledge global concerns about human trafficking. The countries in the region have repeatedly been rebuked by the US State Department for failure to tackle human trafficking. Every major anti-trafficking initiative in the region has been civil society-led. NGOs have carried the main burden in reaching out to trafficked persons, providing health and legal assistance, raising public awareness, steering the national legislative initiatives and providing training and technical assistance to law enforcement and border control authorities. However, civil society involvement is quite recent and they can only provide limited services.

Key challenges are:

  • absence of a joint regional strategy by civil society organisations to combat trafficking
  • duplication in civil society programmes and activities: more agencies focus on awareness raising than on provision of assistance or repatriation of trafficking victims.
  • only a few organisations provide repatriation assistance to the victims of trafficking: one study found only ten out of 250 trafficking-focused agencies are engaged with repatriation.
  • lack of a coherent regional donor/funding approach and existence of several parallel anti-trafficking programmes
  • major donor-supported anti-trafficking programmes in the region often only target specific countries, ignoring others in which traffickers also operate.
 

Some South Asian civil society organisations have pioneered innovative and creative practices which are potentially replicable across the region and further afield. Particularly impressive are the programmes of CHILDLINE India[2], the Bangladesh Counter Trafficking Thematic Group,[3] the Nepal Human Rights Commission,[4] Pakistan’s Insar Burney Welfare Trust[5] and Sri Lanka’s Centre for Women’s Research (CENWOR).

There is an urgent need to:

  • develop new legal and institutional frameworks to promote regional cooperation, especially through the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC)
  • advocate for the establishment of  an office of Rapporteur on Trafficking in Women and Children at SAARC and national level, like the one already existing in Nepal
  • conduct more in-depth research into the demand that underpins sexual abuse and exploitation of children
  • develop compatible national and regional databases of abused, exploited and trafficked children with information on age, gender and nationality
  • encourage private sector involvement in regional initiatives: MTV Europe and Microsoft’s cooperation with the Canadian Police Service to share online access to information on child predators is a good example of what could be done.
  • promote cooperation between civil society organisations and national law enforcement agencies
  • develop policies and institutional mechamisms especially to repatriate victims of trafficking in a dignified and safe manner
  • encourage inter-regional exchange visits and trainings, particularly with eastern  European states
  • train civil servants to make government schemes more gender sensitive.

 

Faisal Yousaf is UNHCR Tanzania’s Resource Mobilization and Donor Reporting Officer. Email: yousaf@unhcr.org. This article is written in a personal capacity and does not reflect the views of UNHCR or the UN.

 

Disclaimer
Opinions in FMR do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors, the Refugee Studies Centre or the University of Oxford.
Copyright
FMR is an Open Access publication. Users are free to read, download, copy, distribute, print or link to the full texts of articles published in FMR and on the FMR website, as long as the use is for non-commercial purposes and the author and FMR are attributed. Unless otherwise indicated, all articles published in FMR in print and online, and FMR itself, are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND) licence. Details at www.fmreview.org/copyright.

 

 

facebook logo Twitter logo RSS logo

Forced Migration Review
Refugee Studies Centre
Oxford Department of International Development
University of Oxford
3 Mansfield Road, Oxford OX1 3TB, UK
fmr@qeh.ox.ac.uk  +44 (0)1865 281700
skype: fmreview